# Difference between revisions of "Stokes parameters"

Line 51: | Line 51: | ||

\end{align} | \end{align} | ||

− | By plugging and chugging these definitions, | + | By plugging and chugging these definitions, it's not too difficult to verify that the following is true: |

\begin{align} | \begin{align} | ||

P_I &= \langle E_x^2 \rangle + \langle E_y^2 \rangle \\ | P_I &= \langle E_x^2 \rangle + \langle E_y^2 \rangle \\ | ||

Line 60: | Line 60: | ||

P_V &= \langle E_l^2 \rangle - \langle E_r^2 \rangle | P_V &= \langle E_l^2 \rangle - \langle E_r^2 \rangle | ||

\end{align} | \end{align} | ||

+ | |||

+ | So although it's not quite obvious from the complex definition, the names for the different P's make sense. Going into a different basis makes it easier to see. | ||

\subsection{A Visual Example} | \subsection{A Visual Example} | ||

Line 83: | Line 85: | ||

[[File:stokes1.png]] | [[File:stokes1.png]] | ||

− | \subsection{ | + | \subsection{Optional: Complex Conjugation Example} |

In case you are rusty on your complex number manipulation, we explicitly calculate $P_U$ and $P_V$. | In case you are rusty on your complex number manipulation, we explicitly calculate $P_U$ and $P_V$. | ||

## Revision as of 12:35, 13 December 2017

STOKES PARAMETERS

## 1 Stokes Parameters

### 1.1 Notation and Conventions

In the following, remember that and are COMPLEX numbers! We will use physicist notational conventions when talking about complex numbers. In particular, recall that for some complex number , where , the complex conjugate is defined as and the squared magnitude is given by .

There’s also two different conventions on describing right vs. left hand polarization. Here we will use the definition where counterclockwise is right, and clockwise is left.

### 1.2 Definition

Stokes parameters are used to describe the polarization state of EM radiation. There are 4 Stokes parameters: is the total intensity, is the polarization along the coordinate axes, is the polarization along the line between the coordinate axes, and is circular polarization.

Notice that all the Stokes parameters are *real* numbers. It might not be obvious because of all the complex conjugation, but it is easy to prove; thus, it is left as a simple exercise for the reader :) A hint on how do this: define and , where , , , . Using these definitions, calculate the Stokes parameters- you’ll see that you only end up with real values.

### 1.3 Changing Bases

Let’s switch bases to understand these definitions a little better; in particular, why is called the polarization along the line between the coordinate axes, and is called circular polarization. Denote the Cartesian basis , the rotated Cartesian basis , and the circular basis , which are defined as follows:

and

Note that , , , , , and are all unit vectors. From these definitions, it also follows that

By plugging and chugging these definitions, it’s not too difficult to verify that the following is true:

So although it’s not quite obvious from the complex definition, the names for the different P’s make sense. Going into a different basis makes it easier to see.

### 1.4 A Visual Example

Sometimes the Stokes parameters are combined into a vector, cleverly called the Stokes vector. The Stokes vector is simply .

The picture below illustrates, from top to bottom:

Linear polarization, horizontal:

Linear polarization, vertical:

Linear polarization, +45 degrees:

Linear polarization, -45 degrees:

Circular polarization, right handed:

Circular polarization, left handed:

All the polarizations have been drawn on different axes to better illustrate how they can be decomposed.

### 1.5 Optional: Complex Conjugation Example

In case you are rusty on your complex number manipulation, we explicitly calculate and .

Calculating :

where we use the linearity of expectation in the last line.

Calculating :