Difference between revisions of "Stokes parameters"

From AstroBaki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 55: Line 55:
     P_Q &= \langle E_x^2 \rangle - \langle E_y^2 \rangle \\
     P_Q &= \langle E_x^2 \rangle - \langle E_y^2 \rangle \\
     P_U &= \langle E_a^2 \rangle - \langle E_b^2 \rangle \\
     P_U &= \langle E_a^2 \rangle - \langle E_b^2 \rangle \\
     P_V &= \langle E_r^2 \rangle - \langle E_l^2 \rangle
     P_V &= \langle E_l^2 \rangle - \langle E_r^2 \rangle

Revision as of 19:40, 12 December 2017

Course Home


FIXME: seems to be different from wikipedia. check on that. (i.e. right vs left polarization, a vs b).

1 A Note on Notation

In the following, remember that and are COMPLEX numbers!!! We will use the “physicist notation" when talking about complex numbers. Recall that for some complex number , where , the complex conjugate is defined as and the squared magnitude is given by .

2 Definition

Stokes parameters: used to describe polarization state of EM radiation.

These 4 s are the Stokes parameters. is the total intensity, is the polarization along the coordinate axes, is the polarization along the line between the coordinate axes, and is circular polarization.

3 Changing Bases

We could just leave it at that, and take these definitions as given. Every definition has a story, so let’s understand it. However, a physical picture is not really obvious to me from these definitions. This is not very obvious (in my opinion) just from inspection of these formulas. Let’s break this down further, and switch bases to make this a little more immediate. Denote the Cartesian basis , the rotated Cartesian basis , and the circular basis , which are defined as follows:


Note that , , , , , and are all unit vectors. From these definitions, we can solve for , , , and in terms of and :

It can now be shown that

Things to notice:

  • All the Stokes parameters are real numbers. It might not be obvious because of all the complex conjugation, but it is easy to prove it to yourself. It is left as a simple exercise for the reader. For example, to do this, define and , where , , , . Using these definitions, calculate the Stokes parameters- you’ll see that you only end up with real values.

4 Actually doing the math...

Calculating by substitution:

where we use the linearity of expectation in the last line. And lo and behold- it matches the definition from earlier!!!

Calculating by substitution:

5 Examples