Difference between revisions of "Radiation Lecture 01"

From AstroBaki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<onlyinclude><includeonly>
 +
* Units
 +
* Proof that Specific Intensity is conserved along a ray
 +
* The Black Body
 +
</includeonly></onlyinclude>
 
<latex>
 
<latex>
 
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
 
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
Line 7: Line 12:
 
\begin{document}
 
\begin{document}
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
 
 
\subsection*{Units}
 
\subsection*{Units}
  

Revision as of 03:54, 14 February 2010

Units

Here are some terms pertaining to telescope observations:

aperture area (), solid angle on sky (), exposure time (), collects energy (), over waveband (), but .

is the specific intensity per unit frequency.

Flux density is power per unit frequency passing through a differential area whose normal is . Thus, flux density is:

Proof that Specific Intensity is conserved along a ray

The power received by the telescope is:

where is the intensity as a function of right-ascension () and declination (). Say that is the surface luminosity of a patch of sky (that is, the emitted intensity). Then power emitted by patch of sky is:

Recognizing that :

This derivation assumes that we are in a vacuum and that the frequencies of photons are constant. If frequencies change, then though specific intensity is not conserved, is. Also, for redshift ,

so intensity decreases with redshift. Finally:

is conserved along a ray, where is the index of refraction.

The Blackbody

A blackbody is the simplest source: it absorbs and reemits radiation with 100% efficiency. The frequency content of blackbody radiation is given by the Planck Function:

(The Planck Function for Black Body Radiation)

Derivation:

The # density of photons having frequency between and has to equal the # density of phase-space cells in that region, multiplied by the occupation # per cell. Thus:

However,

so we have it. In the limit that :

Wein tail

If :

Rayleigh-Jeans tail Note that this tail peaks at . Also,