Galaxies Lecture 07

From AstroBaki
Revision as of 01:24, 15 February 2010 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs) (Created page with '<latex> \documentstyle[11pt]{article} \def\hf{\frac12} \def\imply{\Rightarrow} \def\inv#1{{1\over #1}} \def\ddt{{d\over dt}} \def\ddz#1{{d#1\over dz}} \def\ddr#1{{d#1\over dr}} …')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

  • Morphology
    • The Hubble Tuning Fork Classification (this is not a precise classification scheme).
      • Ellipticals (E0-E5), notated En, where is a measure of eccentricity. Dwarf Ellipticals (dE) are less luminous and hard to observe outside the Local Group. Dwarf Spheroidals (dSph) have very low stellar densities.
      • Lenticulars (S0, SB0), which are between ellipticals and spirals. Lenticular galaxies have a disk with a very large central bulge. For normal-type lenticulars, they are enumerated (S0-S3) according to increasing dust absorption. For barred lenticulars, they are enumerated according to the prominence of the bar.
      • Normal-Type Spirals (Sa-Sc). Subtypes are ordered according to: bulge-to-disk light ratios, tightness with which spiral arms are wound, and the degree to which spiral arms are resolved into stars and HII regions.
      • Barred Spirals (SBa-SBc) are subtyped the same way as normal-type galaxies, but also by rings and lenses, noting the difference between inner rings and outer rings, etc.
      • Irregulars. Some examples are the Magellenic Clouds. Type I Irregulars have bright knots of O and B stars. Type II have smooth images and exhibit dust lanes. Some subtyped irregular galaxies are Starburst galaxies (which have jets, tails, and rings, and are formed by the merger of two disk galaxies), and AGN.
  • Surface Brightness Measurements
    • The specific intensity of galaxies, as we showed in 201, does not depend on distance, so you’d think we can just measure the surface brightness of galaxies directly. However, there are 5 corrections we must make to this:
      • Air Glow (the luminosity of our atmosphere)
      • Zodiacal Light (reflected sunlight off of dust)
      • Faint/Unresolved Stars
      • Extra Galactic Light
      • Seeing (the displacement of photons travelling through the atmosphere).
    • de Vaucouleur’s Law

Where is the magnitude of brightness in the B band. This gives us the intensity of a galaxy as a function of radius:

where is half-light radius. However, , which is to say that our observation of the surface brightness of a galaxy is actually the the integral of the emissivity of the galaxy along the z axis. Taking these we get the Modified Hubble Law:

Note that is the actual radius of a galaxy, and is the radius at which we are viewing a galaxy. Using these equations, we may derive the total luminosity of a galaxy as a function of radius:

This diverges as . To prevent this from happening, we have to model the emissivity as:

It is important to note that for a radially symmetric galaxy, if we observe it to be centrally concentrated in surface brightness, it must be even more highly concentrated volumetrically.

  • The Galaxy Luminosity Function
    • How many galaxies of each (luminosity) type are there in a representative volume of the universe? To answer this question we discuss the Galaxy Luminosity Function:
    • Observations are taken to solve the equation:

However, these observations are subject to several biases:

      • The Malmquist (Volume) Bias
      • is poorly determinted for nearby galaxies, where peculiar velocities outweigh Hubble velocities.
      • Galaxies are not uniformly distributed in space.
    • Accounting for these biases as best we can, we find that for low luminosities, the number of galaxies goes as a power law, and then steepens to an exponential falloff at high luminosities:

where is a normalization factor for the mean density and is of order 1, and . This is called the Schechter Function.

    • We could try to calculate the luminosity density of the universe:

Where . Note that the luminosity of the Milky Way is about

    • We then may attempt to compute the # density of Galaxies:

To prevent divergence, we can’t integrate from .

  • Global Correlations of Elliptical Galaxies
    • We try to classify ellipticals by shape: (eccentricity, "boxiness", velocity dispersions).
    • Also, by "nonshape" characteristics: (luminosity , radius , Surface-Brightness , B-V, ).
    • Surface-Brightness is related to the effective radius :

Then using , we have:

This tells us that larger galaxies have less average surface brightness, and that more luminous galaxies also have less average surface brightness.

    • The Faber-Jackson relationship says that

where is the central velocity dispersion. This tells us that larger galaxies have higher velocity dispersions.

    • The color-magnitude relation was the observation that more luminous galaxies have stronger absorption lines, and that more luminous galaxies are redder. Since reddening is related to metallicity and age of a galaxy (fewer blue stars), this has important implications for galaxy evolution.
    • Relating the three quantities and , we have 2 independent variables. This is called the Fundamental Plane Relation. In the space of these 3 variables, the normal vector of this plane is . An edge of the plane is given by:

We need to come up with a model of galaxy formation which accounts for the flatness of this distribution.

    • Finally, we have the Dn-sigma relation, where is the diameter at which the intensity equals . Using the law and the fundamental plane relation, we find that

Measurements of the Virgo Cluster have determined that:

This relation is good to about a factor of 2 because of inherent scatter in this relation for different elliptical galaxies.