From AstroBaki
Revision as of 17:56, 2 September 2011 by Jmcbride (talk | contribs) (created page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Nuclear Reaction Rates

\The cross section for nuclear reaction depends upon the strong force, and it also depends upon the quantum mechanical probability for tunneling through the Coulomb barrier. These two dependences are independent of one another. The quantum mechanical part also happens to be the part that primarily sets the temperature sensitivity of fusion, and is also the part that is easier to understand. \\Tunneling \To understand tunneling, we start by writing down the Schrodinger equation.

For a simple step like potential, outside of the step, the potential is V = 0, and the solution is a plane wave, and

Here, is the wavenumber. In the step, the potential is just some constant , and

\Large portion missing here (notetaker had to leave lecture)

Fusion Reaction Rates

\We ended last time by writing down the cross section for fusion in terms of the probability of tunneling and an intrinsic strong nuclear physics part that we will use without trying to understand the detailed physics. This cross section is

Here, is the nuclear physics part, is the energy of both particles, and the expontential term is the probability of tunneling through the Coulomb barrier. We wrote in the last class as

This expression can be used to find the probability of a single tunneling event.We want to write down the rate of fusion for a large system of particles. We can start by writing down the rate for lots of particles that all have the same velocity. For distinguishable fusing particles that we will label 1 and 2 with number densities and , we can write down a mean free path

and a mean free time

The number of reactions per unit volume per unit time is then

If we average over all possible velocities, the result is

To find , we need to integrate over the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution

Plugging in (with normalization) the MB distribution, the result is

We would like to put this entirely in terms of the energy, substituting out the velocity. We’ll use

Now we can rewrite our velocity averaged cross section as

Now, plug in our original expression for to find

The tunneling term here favors reactions at high energies, but the Boltzmann term favors reactions at low energies where there are a large number of available particles. Compared to the energy terms in the exponential, is slowly varying, and we can pull it out of the integral, writing


We can draw a picture to understand roughly what this integral will give us. The MB distribution falls quickly with energy, and the probability of tunneling rises exponentially with energy. The product of the two is at a maximum at some energy that falls part way along the tail of each. We can find this by differentiating the integrand above, which we’ll call . Then

Solving we find

In terms of the more fundamental quantities that define ,

This is the energy at which most reactions occur, even though it is far smaller than and far larger than , thanks to the competition between the two. In order to perform the integral above, we will treat the overlap between the two as a Gaussian (method of steepest descent).


If we put this in our integral , we get a Gaussian integral that we can perform. The result is

The final results for our velocity averaged cross section is

\Now, we can start to do something more macroscopic. Let’s define the energy per unit mass per unit time from fusion as . Then the total luminosity is

Then the change in luminosity over radius is

We can also define an energy released per reaction as . Using our rate of reactions per volume per time, we can find , with

We want to put everything in terms of mass density, which we will do with

Here, is the fraction of the total mass that is in particle 1. Together, these allow us to write the energy generation from fusion.

This expression has units ergs per second per gram, and gives the energy from reactions between particles 1 and 2. It is a function of density, temperature, and composition. Since we do not want to carry this whole expression around most of the time, we would like to just write down a simple proportionality in terms of these fundamental variables. In general, we’ll approximate

Depending upon the reaction, and can take different values. For any process involving collisions between two particles, . Finding is a bit more complicated. Our expression for is not a simple power law in temperature. We can approximate it though by noticing that

Writing in terms of only the temperature dependent quantities and then performing the above differentiation, we find

Note that this is a function of temperature. This is only valid then when we are considering a small range of temperature. Fortunately, this is generally a fine approximation when considering fusion in stars. For the proton-proton chain at the center of a sun like star, we find . Then

at temperatures near Kelvin. We can make a bit more detailed an estimate of energy from fusing protons to Helium. Again using K, g cm, the cross section is of order 1 keV barn, and is order 10 MeV. If we put this in our expression for , we find

The luminosity of the Sun is then

This is

What happened in our estimate? This is WAY too big. We can think of a couple of resolutions that would give us a more reasonable estimate. One is that the weak interaction is involved somewhere, as it has a cross section that is times smaller than the strong interaction. The other possibility is that a proton is fusion with a particle that has a much larger charge, which would suppress the term and give much lowre energy generation rates. As it turns out, both of these solutions exist in nature. The proton-proton chain involves conversion of protons to neutrons, which requires the weak interaction. The CNO cycle produces Helium by fusion of protons with C, N, and O. Using either, we would find an energy generation rate that is in much better agreement with the observed luminosity of the Sun. \\Let’s look at the proton proton chain in more detail. The net reaction is

This energy comes out as photons, kinetic energy of particles, and a small amount as neutrinos. The kinetic energy and photon energy is all shared with the star through collisions, and produces the heat inside of stars. The energy in neutrinos is not useful, as it just leaves the star without providing any heat (and, by extension, prssure support against gravity). \\As implied already, the key step in the proton proton chain is the step where a proton turns in to a neutron (necessary since there are two neutrons in Helium, and we are starting with only protons). This step gives its identity as a weak interaction away by the presence of a neutrino.

The cross section for this is keV barn. This is, as promised, much weaker than the typical strong reaction, which has a cross section of order of 1 keV barn. The rest of the reactions needed to produce Helium are easy, involving the strong reaction. First,

which has a cross section of 2.5 keV barn. and then

with cross section 5000 keV barn. Note that the first two steps of the reaction must happen twice for the last step to happen once. That this whole process requires multiple steps is a result of the exceedlingly low probability of four protons all happening to be in the same place at the same time. Even so, determining the overall rate is made simpler by the fact that the slowest step in a cycle sets the rate for the entire cycle. Here, our rate limiting step is the first step, when two protons form a deuterium atom. Then we can calculate the energy generation rate for the entire chain with

This fact will be useful in the CNO cycle as well, which has many steps, but is also rate limited by a single step, allowing us to easily write down the energy generation rate. Using our previous (complicated) expression for energy generation and applying it to the proton-proton step, we find the energy for the entire chain to be

With the constants,

We can use this to estimate the central temperature of the Sun, using the known luminosity.

This is pretty good, and is (fortunately) self consistent.