Difference between revisions of "Coulomb Focusing"
(Created page with '===Short Topical Videos=== * [http://youtu.be/LXGBGNR5JxI Coulomb Focusing (Aaron Parsons)] ===Reference Material=== * <latex> \documentclass[11pt]{article} \def\inv#1{{1 \ove…') |
|||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
\begin{document} | \begin{document} | ||
\section*{ Coulomb Focusing} | \section*{ Coulomb Focusing} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Imagine an incident electron has kinetic energy $>h\nu_{21}$. | ||
+ | $$\frac12 m_rv^2 \approx \frac12 m_ev^2 > h\nu_{21}$$ | ||
+ | \item Coulomb focusing gives $\inv{v^2}$ cross-section. | ||
+ | \end{itemize} | ||
+ | We want to know how far away an electron with $v$ can be aimed | ||
+ | and still hit the $a_0$ radius cloud around the ion. This is $b$, the | ||
+ | {\bf impact parameter}. Our collision cross-section $=\pi b^2$. Our | ||
+ | angular momentum is conserved, so | ||
+ | $$m_ev\,b=m_ev_fa_0$$ | ||
+ | We know that $v_f^2 = v^2 + v_\perp^2$, where $v_\perp$ is the velocity | ||
+ | $\perp$ to the original electron velocity. This is a result of it falling | ||
+ | toward the ion. Then: | ||
+ | $$\frac12 m_ev_\perp^2 \sim {Ze^2\over a_0}$$ | ||
+ | $$v_f^2 = v^2 + {Ze^2\over m_ea_0}$$ | ||
+ | $$b={a_0v_f\over v}$$ | ||
+ | $$\pi b^2 = {\pi a_0^2\over v^2}\left[v^2+{Ze^2\over m_ea_0}\right]$$ | ||
+ | $$= \pi a_0^2\left[1+\underbrace{Ze^2\over m_ev^2a_0}_{Coulomb\ focusing\atop | ||
+ | factor}\right]$$ | ||
+ | Generally, the Coulomb focusing factor $>1$ because we want to excite, not | ||
+ | ionize. $a_0={\hbar^2\over Ze^2m_e}$, so: | ||
+ | $$\pi b^2 = {\pi\hbar^2\over m_ev^2}$$ | ||
+ | $$\sigot = {\pi\hbar^2\over m_e^2v^2} | ||
+ | \overbrace{\left({\Omega(1,2)\over | ||
+ | g_1}\right)}^{quantum\ mechanical\atop correction\ factor}$$ | ||
+ | $\Omega$ is the ``collisional strength'', and generally is 0 below the | ||
+ | $v$ threshold, goes to 1 at the threshold, and decreases for increasing | ||
+ | $v$, with some occasional spikes. Generally, it is of order 1, with some | ||
+ | slight temperature dependency. | ||
+ | $$\qot=\mean{\sigot v} \propto \mean{\inv{v}} \propto \inv{\sqrt{T}}$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2000 K gas. $v_{term} \sim \sqrt{\gamma kT\over m}$, so | ||
+ | $v\sim \sqrt{2000\over 100}42\cdot 1{km\over s} \approx 160{km\over s}$. Then | ||
+ | $$\sigot \sim 10^{-14}cm^2\left({\Omega(1,2)\over g_1}\right)$$ | ||
+ | $$\sigot\eval{osterbrock} \sim 10^{-15} cm^2$$ | ||
\end{document} | \end{document} | ||
</latex> | </latex> |
Revision as of 15:21, 2 October 2013
Short Topical Videos
Reference Material
Coulomb Focusing
Imagine an incident electron has kinetic energy .
Coulomb focusing gives cross-section.
We want to know how far away an electron with can be aimed and still hit the radius cloud around the ion. This is , the impact parameter. Our collision cross-section . Our angular momentum is conserved, so
We know that , where is the velocity to the original electron velocity. This is a result of it falling toward the ion. Then:
Generally, the Coulomb focusing factor because we want to excite, not ionize. , so:
is the “collisional strength”, and generally is 0 below the threshold, goes to 1 at the threshold, and decreases for increasing , with some occasional spikes. Generally, it is of order 1, with some slight temperature dependency.
2000 K gas. , so . Then