Cosmology Lecture 05

From AstroBaki
Revision as of 22:12, 14 February 2010 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs) (Created page with '<latex> \documentstyle[11pt]{article} \def\hf{\frac12} \def\imply{\Rightarrow} \def\inv#1{{1\over #1}} \def\aa{{\dot a \over a}} \def\adda{{\ddot a \over a}} \def\thnot{\theta_0}…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Finishing the Robertson-Walker Metric

We’ve been following Weinberg’s derivation to show there are discrete metrics. We’ll start with:

Recall that is the curvature constant and is in comoving coordinates. If we define , then:

The beauty of this metric is that we derived it only using symmetry (no dynamics). There is an alternate way of writing the metric above:

where:

Comoving Radial Distance vs. Redshift: the Hubble Diagram

This is the fundamental diagram behind using a standard candle (supernova) to infer the curvature of the universe. What we want here is an algebraic expression relating and . We’ll look at light propagation (), and take a radial path () to know from the Robertson-Walker metric that:

Separating out our dependencies and our dependencies and integrating, we get:

  • For the flat, , matter-dominated model (, , ), we’ll start with the Friedmann Equation:

Recognizing that , we have:

These integrals evaluate to (in comoving ):

Here, is called the Hubble distance and is the definition of how far away we can possibly see–how far light could have traveled since the beginning of time. Notice that as , .

  • For the open, , , model, we’ll substitute , for in the integral above:

From this, we can use Mattig’s Formula, which states for , arbitrary , that:

In general, for arbitrary (we’ll derive this in PS#3), one can show that, in comoving :

where is a funny function:

Note that when , for arbitrary , we recover Mattig’s Formula.

Angular Diameter Distance

The angular diameter distance is a useful quantity which relates the physical size or separation of objects to the angular size on the sky. For normal, Euclidean geometries, this is trivial trigonometry. For a curved universe, this is not trivial. For example, in some universes, an object pulled far enough away may actually start looking larger (have a larger angular diameter) than a closer object!

This brings us to the end of the smooth universe. We’ve seen , but we have not seen any perturbations off of that. Similarly, we’ve seen , but no spatial components of density. We will begin to talk about perturbations off of the Smooth Universe, and we will call this:

The Bright Side of the Universe

Let’s do a quick tour of the the particles out there to give some context to what we’re talking about. Take a look at Review of Particle Physics, which is also at http://pgd.lbl.gov, for some more detailed information.

First, we’ll talk about fermions. Fermions come in two varieties: Leptons and Quarks. Quarks are hadrons and group together to from baryons (made of 3 quarks) and mesons (made of quark-antiquark pairs). Elementary Particles: Fermions (spin )